Weekly Outlook: The Fed’s Credibility Problem Nobody Wants to Talk About

ON1010 Research — Weekly Economic Outlook

The Federal Reserve achieved something remarkable this week: it held rates steady at 3.5% while bond markets essentially called them naive. For all the talk of the Fed’s “data-dependent” approach and precision monetary policy, the yield curve delivered a more honest assessment. Two-year Treasury yields jumped to 3.56% even as the Fed funds rate sat pinned at 3.64%, creating a spread that whispers what no one wants to say out loud: the market thinks the Fed is behind the curve again.

This is not about one week of volatile oil prices or a temporary spike in breakeven inflation expectations to 2.33%. This is about whether the central bank that spent two years fighting the last inflation war is prepared for the next one. The data this week suggests they are not, and more importantly, that they do not realize it yet.

The oil shock provides the clearest example of the Fed’s blind spot. Crude prices jumped 20% in a single week as supply concerns resurfaced, dragging gasoline prices up 16% and sending ripples through every corner of the economy. The textbook response would be to dismiss this as a temporary supply shock, exactly what Fed officials did in their post-meeting communications. But here is what they missed: in an economy where profit margins are at historic highs and productivity gains are masking underlying cost pressures, energy price spikes do not behave like they did in 2018 or even 2021.

Corporate America has spent the last three years rebuilding pricing power, and those fat margins create a cushion that allows companies to pass through energy costs without immediately crimping demand. When Oracle restructures its balance sheet to capitalize on AI infrastructure spending, when businesses continue investing in productivity-enhancing technology despite elevated rates, when the private sector grows at 2.8% even as government spending creates drag through DOGE cuts, you are looking at an economy with genuine momentum. That momentum transforms temporary supply shocks into persistent price pressures.

The bond market sees this dynamic more clearly than the Fed does. The gentle steepening of the yield curve is not the healing everyone wants to celebrate. It reflects growing concern that the Fed’s 3.5% terminal rate assumption is fiction. When 2-year yields hold near recent highs while 10-year yields drift higher, bond traders are pricing in a world where the Fed falls further behind inflation expectations rather than getting ahead of them. The fact that breakeven inflation expectations have stabilized around 2.33% is not victory. It is the market giving the Fed one last chance to get this right before expectations become unmoored again.

The productivity story makes this particularly dangerous. The AI-driven efficiency gains that everyone celebrates are real, but they create a false sense of security about inflation pressures. Yes, productivity growth allows the economy to expand without generating immediate price pressures, but it also allows businesses to absorb cost shocks without cutting output or employment. When energy prices spike by 20% in a week and companies can maintain margins by automating more processes or optimizing supply chains, the traditional disinflationary feedback loop breaks down. Instead of oil price spikes forcing economic contraction that brings down broader prices, you get persistent energy inflation alongside continued economic expansion.

This is precisely what happened in the mid-1990s, when technology-driven productivity gains masked building inflation pressures until they exploded in 1999-2000. The pattern is remarkably similar: corporate profits rising faster than GDP, productivity masking cost pressures, central bank officials convinced they had engineered a new paradigm where traditional inflation dynamics no longer applied. The difference is that today’s productivity gains are concentrated in AI and automation rather than broad-based technology adoption, making the economy simultaneously more efficient and more vulnerable to supply-side shocks.

Next week brings the moment of truth. Consumer Price Index data will show whether the oil shock is already feeding through to broader inflation measures, but more importantly, it will reveal whether the underlying momentum in services prices has accelerated. Core CPI has been holding right at the Fed’s 2% target, but that stability depends on continued disinflation in housing services and goods prices. If energy costs start showing up in transportation, food processing, and manufacturing while services inflation holds steady rather than declining, the Fed’s soft landing becomes a hard problem.

The other key data point will be initial jobless claims, which have held below 210,000 for five consecutive weeks. In normal times, that would be unambiguously good news. In this environment, it confirms that labor markets remain tight enough to pass through cost pressures via wage growth, creating the second leg of an inflation feedback loop that the Fed seems unprepared to address.

Bottom Line: The Fed is fighting the last inflation war while the next one builds around energy-driven cost pressures that productivity gains cannot offset indefinitely. Bond markets are pricing in policy mistakes ahead, and the data suggests they are right to worry. This economy has more momentum and less inflation sensitivity than the Fed assumes.


ON1010.com provides economic education for investors. Nothing here is investment advice. Always consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Free Research

The economy moves fast. We make sure you move faster.

Economic data, policy shifts, and market signals — delivered to your inbox.

Subscribe Free